If someone has pulled your branch, or you have pushed it somewhere, you should merge into it instead, to avoid confusion and extra work on the other end.
Without going into any of the rest of the important details, the way Git handles this merge request is to work backwards to find the best shared commit, which in this case, is commit H. The actual result after git rebase master in branch feature is this: ( A-B-C ) A'-B'-C' featureĬommits A, B, C are dangling after the rebase, but are reachable through git reflog feature as Merge We can pick either of these two branch namesand hence either commit J or commit L and then ask Git to merge the other last commit.
#MERGE IN MASTER GIT PLUS#
However, git rebase is only suitable when nobody else is working on it, or there will be confusion and extra work for them, because the old commits A, B, C are now replaced by new commits A', B', C', plus F and G that were not there before. Suppose we want to merge a branch featureBranch into our master branch. GitHub Desktop helps the git user to perform the git-related tasks graphically. The ways to check the merge conflict for a local repository and solve this issue have been explained in this tutorial. Taking the example from the git rebase manual, git rebase master in branch feature: A-B-C feature A'-B'-C' featureĭ-E-F-G master D-E-F-G master Git will mark the file as merge conflict, and the git users have to solve this issue before continuing the work. The git merge command facilitates you to take the data created by git branch and integrate them into a single. If the branch has not been distributed to other people, in this case i would prefer git rebase.īecause git rebase makes it as if the changes on the feature branch were made on top of the changes on the master branch, which makes the version graph simpler. It joins two or more development history together. You can either git merge master or git rebase master.
0 kommentar(er)
